Thursday, September 09, 2004

Overheard on a blind date

"See, the way I have my 401(k) set up . . . I put in 5% of my paycheck, and I get 15% . . ."

For real.

It was nice of this guy to let the woman he was with know right away that he's maybe the most boring human being on earth. No bandying about, no Beaudelaire in the original French, no existential cinema--straight to the retirement plan. That's a straight shooter.

Now take that next step and remove yourself from the dating pool completely sir.

I'm going to miss the eavesdropping Seattle's coffeeshop culture affords me.

'A dysfunction of our politics'

Who is this democracy representing? There's a certain ban that's about to expire. Don't click that link yet, just think about this for a second. If there is a ban on something, it doesn't matter what it is, that has "widespread popular support" and that the President said he would ostensibly support if it crossed his desk, shouldn't that ban be pushed? Shouldn't it be renewed? Don't representative democracies function on the assumption that if the people want something, their representatives fight for it?

What if it was "supported by at least two-thirds of Americans." A supermajority of people support this bill, why would it flounder? Why would law makers let it expire?

It is, I feel, a lack of concern for the desires, opinions and fears of their constituents.

There are, of course, the patently political reasons. Fear of backlash:
Democrats are well aware that they lost control of the House of Representatives in 1994, the year President Bill Clinton signed the original legislation
excuses:
Representative Tom DeLay of Texas, dismissed the ban as "a feel-good piece of legislation"
and the utter lack of touch with popular opinion:
"I think the will of the American people is consistent with letting it expire, so it will expire," Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee
Which Americans again? I think he means the 33% who have amongst their ranks the NRA, a gun lobby that is categorically against any kind of gun restrictions whatsoever. This ban is on assault weapons by the way. These are weapons that have no purpose besides tactical use against humans.

I'm tempted to go on a tyrade about how these weapons are useless in mundane, non-murder scenarios like target shooting, skeet, and hunting, but that really has nothing to do with this.

Representative democracy is failing right now, it's caving to special interest groups who, because of the money they dump into campaigns every cycle, are able to exert an absurd amount of influence and undermine the integrity of our legislative system.

I'm so mad I can't think of anything funny or ironic to go along with this

Fundamentalism

It makes you crazy.

It makes you think not only that this is what God wants, but that you have the skills necessary to circumcise an 8 year old boy.
Deputies recovered from inside the home a sheathed, black-handled knife with a blade measuring about 3 inches, Farr said. -- The Oregonian
Bravest kid ever.

God.

So many psychopaths in Washington. Must be the clean air.


Which recent research shows is not so darn harmful

Wednesday, September 08, 2004

Passing eNotes

Requiring student laptops in classrooms? Eventually, sure. But I suggest not until you start tenuring a new generation of professors to be more entertaining than porn and flash games. These speculative professors would have to present information in ways that can't already be found on Stanford Philosophical Encyclopedia or Wikipedia or Sparknotes.

Without a massive shift in classroom presentation, mandatory laptops will mark the beginning of a mass classroom exodus, if not a corporeal one, at least a redirection of attention from the stage to the (computer) screen.

Good luck with that.

Three or four friends and I used to huddle together in the back of a certain Philosophy lecture and pick apart with snot-nosed impudence everything the professor would say. The syllabus for this particular lecture had been typed and thoroughly drenched in White-out. The liquid corrector had built up layers like tree rings--visible even after photocopying--and was over-typed thusly: Spring 2003. After careful study, I was able to identify no less than 8 separate layers of White-out. That means this man's syllabus had remained unchanged for at least 4 years. His translations from the original Latin were in a steady and practiced cursive. I was taught cursive in third grade, and told not to use it anymore in fourth.

For this man, Xeroxing represented the bleeding edge of technology.

His field of expertise would not be surprising.

How could this poor, disconnected, stodgy, boring, laconic, static--though unquestionably brilliant --man ever hope to compete with the internet? He wouldn't have held a candle to minesweeper.

Against 25 individual nodes whizzing, humming, thrusting information and excitement on demand to student's desktops, homeboy brought sparklers and a puppet show.

That's to say nothing of the inherently subversive nature of instant messaging.

My friends and I were grouped, passing notes kindergarten style, written in the margins, then eventually all across the page of our notebooks. We passed them around. If we caused to much havoc his attention would be diverted to us, and we'd have to chill.

Imagine what wifi and computers would have done. All of a sudden this shuddering mass in the back middle becomes dispersed and decentralized. We would be 5 individual subversive cells, working in tandem across the room. Now imagine the other 20 kids, not actively mocking him, but forced to choose between the words of Thomas Aquinas in cursive on the overhead projector accompanied by one droning commentary, or Thomas Aquinas' words in Ariel, with pictures and links to separate resources, including fifteen or twenty separate commentaries--all on demand.

The choice is obvious. All of a sudden the professor has no cred, he's a syllabus generator, essentially worthless.

Even as a Computer Science major, class was attended only under threat of pop quiz. The Microsoft knowledge base was a far better tutor than any 30 year veteran of Hewlett-Packard who took an early out to teach. The English was generally less broken.

In four years of college, I probably had two professors who adequately utilized the power of the internet to inform and drive discussion. Two . . . were . . . Adequate.

For their classes, computers and the internet at large were vital and added deep and fecund layers of experience and participation.

For everyone else, the internet was a foe--an excuse to not read the middle third of that Bronte novel, to skip Spinoza completely.

Academia's first big concern with the free flow of information over the internet was the risk of plagiarism. This underestimated both the power of the net and the desire of students to learn.

The internet is not endangering University positions, it's not even really endangering the intellectual property of great
(and lesser) minds, it's challenging those minds to delve deep into the resources available and realize what students already know: All the crap you spent days at the microfilm reader researching when you were an undergrad, is now a meta search away. It's digitized, OCRed, abstracted, and cited in MLA for the enrichment of undergrads and doctors alike.

Use it.

If this had a track to begin with, I think I've gotten off it.

Why do you pull up in valet parking with a Benz that is rented,
Fronting on a cellular phone that doesn't work - why?
Why are you smirking up your face, making . . . obnoxious facial scenes
like I supposed to be scared - why?

D'OH

The Genesis capsule just turned into a quarter-billion dollar egg drop test.

Sucks.

Insert failure-compounding NASA-supplied silver lining here.

The minutes, so far.

"The Genesis team is now following a contingency plan that was devised for precisely this scenario."
M E M O

Genesis Contingency Plan -- Classified

Broom
Dustpan

End communique


Metric bypass computes on overload retrace cause we're Lost in space.


Collectible Capital

I went to Starbucks this morning at the tail end of my commute. I hadn't been in one for a while.

They're all pretty busy, but the one at the east end of Redmond Way does its best to affect the tone and clamor of the trading floor at a stock exchange. It's a nice effect. Customers bark commands into their hands-free units while keeping one eye on the clock, the other searching out a bare spot of floor or wall to avoid eye contact with other patrons. Baristas accept drive-thru orders via their own headsets and condense the civilian-speak into the highly specific, abbreviated to-go cup jargon that facilitates wordless communication.

There are always incredibly interesting things to see in places like this, amidst the sea of humanity trying to rend milliseconds of sanity from their hyper-productive lives.

Today I saw the strangest damn thing ever. The woman in front of me spent her queue time consciously fingering every piece of merchandise along the edifice of the counter. She touched sandwiches, she touched teddy bears. She squeezed a mug whilst shaking up some Odwalla. It wasn't until she reached the front though, that her fingers really seized onto something.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usShe grabbed it, turned it over, put it back. Her fingers kind of danced over it for a minute, then she picked it back up. It was a Starbucks Card. "What a thoughtful gift," I said to myself, giving the gift of ready-made coffee.

My mother has given me several of these cards in the last year, struggling to find a gift for the Seattleite that has next to nothing. "Starbucks is good, that's what they do over there," I imagine her thinking as decides to forego her regular, de-centralized drive-up espresso kiosk--which are more fashionable in the Inland Empire--that she may purchase for her son a gift that grasps the corporate beverage essence of his new life away from home.

Then the woman did something strange. She asked for $30 dollars on the card, "and take my coffee out of that."
"This morning?"
"Yes"

The Barista was confused as well. Confusing a Barista is difficult. Things became a little clearer when the woman was asked if she'd like an envelope for her gift card, now worth approximately $26.78.

"No thanks, it's for me. "

To . . . what . . . end?

I can't imagine why someone would trade one form of capital at a 1 to 1 conversion rate for another of more limited purchasing power. Bi-monthly Coffee budget? Perhaps.

I remember though, reading about the commemorative 4th of July Starbucks card of a few years ago, the first of the seasonal Starbucks cards. Highly collectible, I'm told. One recently sold for more than $500 dollars.

I don't know what that says about us as a nation, that we collect and trade our limited and perishable devices of capital transmission--our gift certificates.

I was planning a more forceful conclusion, but I just can't wrap my head around it.

Collecting in general is strange . . .


Tuesday, September 07, 2004

Drudgerous and Sacred Acts

This was originally back-story for something else. It ended up being much better than that other thing. I'm working right now on bushwhacking my way through all the dense, elliptical verbosity and getting at something a little more accessible.
Jon was born to the kind of parents who would freely add or sacrifice letters, silent or otherwise if necessary, to create the illusion of free-thought and novelty in the drudgerous and sacred act of child name giving. This was the kind of mostly silent protest you could count on from father, Jon often said, as he straddled the tipping point between repentant liberalism and smash-mouthed yuppiedom. In a battle that would rage for the better half of a lifetime, the artlessly-named boy would consistently play the role of collateral damage.

In becoming a charter member of the suit-and-tie, high-yield-bonded Reagan Youth, father had sold out just in time to catch the wave of unrestrained Capitalism trickling down from Wall Street and winding its way to California, the land of a nation’s savior. Mother would be added later, somewhere on father’s ascent to a respectable life. She would be blonde and tastefully trashy, somewhere between Madonna and Tammy Faye Baker. She would be selected for her looks, her quiet personality and loud fashion sense—as flamboyant and mute as a decade of discerning gentlemen required.

Prescient in his youth, father had seen the whole rocky, decadent mess that was his teens and early twenties imploding and was quick to jump ship. Suburbia would be his life raft. Funny, he was known to muse in his later years, that all it took was one take-charge act to make him a take-charge kind of guy, a go-getter.

But often, while going and getting, he was given to pangs of conscience. He could often be found recalling his football days, the flowing hair, the flaring pants and the weed. Cheerleaders were to be hunted like game then boy. Jon of course didn’t know what father meant, but it seemed to take him back. The years had done much to ingratiate father's youth to the man he had become. Sure, being a pot-smoking football player in a decade rife with THC and contact sports made him a human cliché, but clichés are only clichés to those outside the clique, and no one father knew gave a shit about outsiders anyway. In those days, like today and every other day, a person was only as good as their public perception, and he was a perceived god to those whose perceptions carried weight.

This collective hallucination was milked for the better part of 9 years. Time itself stopped in father’s trek to manhood, the past was accepted for the blissful haze it was—idyllic. The future was put off as long as possible. In the milky twain he managed a strange synergy. He mainlined Pink Floyd and Ted Nugent in equal doses, freely mixing acid grooves with jagged, arena-sized misogyny. His young life was a hinterland carved in the lull between cultural revolutions: constantly referencing that golden period of childhood fondly called the sixties, while allowing events to snowball toward the cocaine-laced sobriety that would usher in the decade of Jon’s birth.

Shit, God, Those were some damn good days, he would often say.

Good though they were, father understood at a certain point that the days of youth had to be put aside. He had made the tired assertion everyone makes after a certain age when life achieves the exhaustion of moving endlessly nowhere. Needed to give his ahhss a good kick-stawt—aahnd quick. Though college imprinted on father the colloquialisms of the Midwest, he was originally from much farther East and the hard-nosed range-speak rattled cacaphonically against his soft, faintly elongated Massachusen vowels.

Yeah, it was time to grow up. His prescience was marked by a realism that, on occasion, allowed him to pull back the resin-coated curtain of lethargy and see certain things: things like his future and things like the past. It was during one of these moments that he recognized the seventies for the muddled decade it was. And he realized too that he had played the part perfectly, proudly displaying his eight track tapes in order of listening frequency: Kiss and the Bee Gees to top the list.

The indeterminacy of the path he traveled had left him exhausted and it was time for a change. The watershed event father would revisit endlessly throughout his years—his passing into hyper-capitalistic manhood—roughly coincided with another life-changing occurrence: the departure of his sixteen year old neighbor to military school. One of the summers home from college, Ricky Jeffries had become father’s most trusted friend, despite being six years father’s junior and had the enviable position as the only steady hold left in the neighborhood.

So full of coincidence, this life, Jon’s father was known to muse.

The new life, which had been traded straight-up for the old, not much worse for the wear and at a respectable interest rate, was far more stark and angular. Father now walked in a world where women’s business wear had shoulder pads built in; everything was square, the haircuts as much as the people who wore them. Never cared much for that pointy-look, liked my girls curvy, Jesus God I loved’m curvy, he would say, years later as he slid into the impotent madness of middle-age. Still, he went along, got in line and paid his dues. His wife was all the time at his side, the entire six odd feet of her, platinum blonde, boxy and severe. It’s all cocaine and daily shaving from here on out, he realized—and it never did quite compare to the rarefied air of adolescence. His memory was a tug of war, continually bringing him back to those early times because they stuck with him no matter what he tried, the memory of his feathered hair clinging to life in the back of his mind. As years passed and stories continually recycled themselves, father would admit there was something gripping about possessing true greatness in one’s youth and for that he was obliged to remember. He kept to himself the realization that, from such greatness, one can only hope to weave a brilliant and cascading tapestry of failure.

Once, in the days after the abrupt end to his trading, Father returned from a seaside tryst with a metaphor he would write into the legal pad he wrote such metaphors in. The past, like one’s first love is also like the tide, but a tide that only goes out, forever and ever and you stop being able to see it so after it you run but you never get close enough to it again, and by the time you realize you’ll never really see it the way you used to see it, you turn around and the land’s gone too. So you turn back around and keep chasing. College had left him profoundly affected by the writings of Jack Kerouac, and the memoirs found next to his charred remains would point to some very beat literary sentiment—painfully long groups of comma-spliced phrases carefully masquerading as a stream of consciousness.

So there it was, the past. He never quite got over it, no matter how often he returned to it.

***

In this deceptively simple milieu Jon came to be, the son of a junk-bond trader and an inoffensive pair of ovaries, the product of designer drugs and teeth-gnashing regret. Thankfully there were more designer drugs than regret swirling in father’s brainpan on the day the name of he, the first-born, had been consecrated before the eyes of God and family. The boy would grow, over the years, to hate ‘Jon’ as a name in an abstract way, for all the things it came to represent for him. He also, however, recognized that it could have been worse. Jesus, God it could’ve been worse.

***

When Jon was old enough to enjoy the tall tales of his childhood, his father told him the harrowing story of how he, the first born, was almost named Pētr. The name was a throwback to father’s days as a Division II quarterback at some school in the Midwest. Father and his friends had gotten unbelievably high and decided they needed to give the American language a good kick in the ass. They agreed it was better than any language they had taken in high school—and certainly better than Russian or Chinese or Vietnamese or whatever—but it still needed something. Ideas were bandied about, soft criticism was lobbed, insults and apologies in more or less equal number.

This was a favorite node of comparison for father, one he returned to time and again during quiet moments alone in later years. The differences between the masculine ribaldry of his youth and his adulthood puzzled him. He would often wonder, when comparing decades, if the eighties’ unforgiving lifestyle had been more a product of the drugs of choice than the hardened greed of the age. The coke made him distant, something he never really felt in his starter jacket swaddled in the concupiscent curdled plumes of the dorm room. There was nothing warm or poetic about it. There was no sentiment. It created a lifestyle of distance, devoid of apologies. None of his associates or clients (victims, the judge would call them) ever read Wallace Stevens, which was clearly a symptom of a deeper inability to empathize. None of them knew how much depended on the red wheel barrel. For this father pitied them.

Empathy was never a problem in the dorm room, which is probably why nothing linguistically earth-shattering was accomplished that day, or on any other day. They generally agreed that this new tongue should be a re-imagining of Orwellian Newspeak but not, you know, so fascist . . . but not fucking communist either. The logistics were tough because they were trying to improve upon something they admittedly didn’t understand very well. It was beginning to become all too big a burden as they sat figuring out how to handle antonyms, when someone slaughtered and gutted the proceedings by asking just what was, you know, really, the difference between good and evil? Self-consciousness whipped through the room with gale force. So, hastily and a little ashamed, they just took out letters that seemed unnecessary and replaced them with the corresponding phonetic symbols, passed the thing around one more time and let their revisions fade into legend, let the grand creation become the thing they always returned to out of reverence for how awesome the act of creation itself had been.

Pētr Blāk was father’s roommate, best friend, product of the same hometown, and the most dependable hold at the time of their miniature linguistic revolution. He didn’t survive college and in death was directly responsible for Jon’s life. It was Petrs freshly shuffled coil that gave rise to the robust dope monopoly Ricky Jeffries had enjoyed. Pētr, then, in absence contributed to the narcotics vacuum caused by the sixteen-year-old’s disappearance.

Father had long felt that children’s names ought to be like the names the great men of America gave the great football stadiums of America: fashioned in reverential memoriam to the clouded lives of fractured men. With Pētr still warming through putrefaction the three or so feet adjacent his coffin, there was no question that calling Jon ‘Pētr’ was the sentimentally safe decision—the wounds were so fresh.

Through much of his wife’s 45 week pregnancy, in fact, it remained the unspoken choice until, on the day of his son’s eventual birth, father woke up and concluded, under the far-off nodding of Jon’s dotard mother—by now swollen to many times her original size and heavily-sedated—that Pētr was just too damn weird a name for someone as normal as his kid was going to be. Came to him in a dream.

That is, the choice had been made for him in one of his flashes of prescience. The vision was of the awkward and inevitable moment when one of young Pētrs (father and the Blākmīstr later decided to do away with extraneous punctuation as well) classmates, upon learning the standard—read: fascist—modes of English phonetic communication, would struggle with Pēts name (further truncated by childhood) and it would obviously come out sounding like ‘pet'. Father quickly concluded that Jon was just edgy enough to keep people on their toes without suggesting his baby boy was a closeted dominant-submissive or the vessel of more bestial predilections. Once more father felt he had, at the last minute, played both sides and won.

***

So it was Jon and that was that. And in the years that had transpired between the time his name was chosen for him—amid rabid decrees of post-fetal normalcy—and his sophomore year in high school, Jon’s parents had succeeded in turning him into a complete fucking train wreck—Jon’s words now, not his father’s.

***

Monday, September 06, 2004

Kind of a big step

It took me a week to draw the necessary conclusion, but I think I've come to it. I blogged about how all the fiction I've written isn't worth the 1s and 0s it's magnetized in. In a later blog I came to the realization that I can't really trust my opinion of anything--or rather, that I can't mill anything approaching objectivity from the chaff of my emotional reactions.

The synthesis that was so long in coming is that I can't really trust my opinion of my own things. Seems obvious now, as things often do after you've realized them.

What did it was that--despite saying I never would--I began retooling a few of the vignettes I had so thoroughly panned the other night. I rediscovered, to an extent, the mindset I was in when I originally conceived them.

It was a good place. Much better than expected. I was also in a much better mood--there's the rub.

Once again my tire swing of sensibility has exerted considerable influence.

I can't trust myself, so I'm thinking I should trust you. Both of you. I'm considering the kind-of-big step of showing my modest corpus of work to whomever ends up here. I've actually already made the decision. The next 10 or so hours are reserved for any input you'd like to give, threats or pleas, that might make me change my mind and forgo the disclosure.

Use this time wisely.

The RNC, Contextualized

Here's a funny look at how New Yorkers took to the RNC, and the mock awards the Conventioneers would walk away with if the NY Times staff had their way. Image Hosted by ImageShack.usMy favorite:

"Best euphemism: Marvin Scott, the Republican Senate candidate from Indiana, an African-American, for calling his ancestors 'involuntary immigrants.'"

Alan Keyes should kick it with this guy, there's no telling the caveats and distinctions they could come up with.
"I think we all can agree that, aside from those who involuntarily immigrated directly to this great nation, no American of African decent can ever really be considered African-American." -- Fictional Keyes/Scott press release
You may have noticed that I'm separating myself from the campaign trail itself because I just can't do it anymore, it's too painful. Still, election cycles bring to bear the deepest absurdities the human race has to offer and such things remain newsworthy, despite how much of the rest of the campaign discourse is not.

Absurdity is something that all humans can cleave to, regardless of political affiliation.

So I'm trying to comment in the most elliptical way possible on stuff that I (and hopefully everyone) can laugh about as patently political ridiculosity.

Being neighborly

It occurs to me that one of the bullet points from [Moving out is hard to do] might need a little clarification.
  • What I thought was a big rat was really a giant red squirrel
That one.

The apartment’s defenses were breached a little over a week ago. What food existed in the place was found thrown to the floor. Wrappers were torn asunder. Hard plastic lids were gnawed through with small incisors. At first I suspected Shannon, but the amount of time she spent that night standing on various tables and shrieking suggested she knew as little about this as I did. The alternative was that she possessed stage presence like I'd never seen. Most strange.

Before it had time to begin, the case struck a brick wall.
Me: Are you sure it wasn't you?
Shannon: Shutup Luke.
After some debate and further investigation, (nothing of value was gone, the damage was confined to the kitchen) I concluded it was a mouse.
Shannon: Could it be a rat?
Me: No way. Rat teeth are hella bigger than that. [aside] God, what if it’s a rat?
I then explained to Shannon that I was on the table because my back hurt. It had nothing to do with our little intruder and that there was no room for her. That night, on the table, eyes glued to the shadows, I couldn’t help thinking that maybe my standard of living was a bit . . . messy. I tried to reassure myself with a carefully directed line of questioning.
Me: What would a little mouse want with us? What would attract it?
Shannon: We live like goddamned animals Luke, look around.
She was no help, but got a pass because she was almost hysterical. Even in her madness, the words contained a certain logic. Still skeptical, I googled “hanta virus mortality rate” just in case. The prognosis wasn’t good, and I could tell by the look on Shannon’s face that she had no intention of touching the little nuggets left by our friend.
***
The morning after Shannon left, the intruder struck again. This time, I was home. The intervening week had brought a strange cough that felt a little like my insides were melting.

There was a storm the night before and I awoke to the sound of blinds throughout the apartment swinging to and fro. I tried to ignore it. Then things started falling. I assumed this was because of the wind and the blinds. Then the blinds stopped.

Things kept falling.

Availing myself of pants, I moved to the kitchen.

The squirrel and I found ourselves in a brief showdown, I at the portal and he on the kitchen table. He was huge for a squirrel. Thankfully, so am I. I watched his furry little eyes calculating how long he could live off my man-carcass, then, the risk of trying to bring down such a hulking trophy. The odds must not have been good. He decided to cut his loses, grabbed the hunk of pita he was chewing on, evacuated his bowels in a half-dozen staccato portions on the table, and scampered out the window I had left open.

I was happy enough to have been absolved of the sin of living like a filthy, disease-ridden animal. This, though, was more than I could have hoped for. If mice [rats] are proof you’re a slob, then squirrels--by far the most noble of rodents--are clearly a sign of austerity and cultivation. They're just so cute, and their feces isn't infused with airborne death.

I was a little sad that he didn’t stay longer, but I understood.

I think he was embarrassed about having to borrow food. My mom certainly used to be. Whenever she decided to bake treats for my brother and me, she'd always be out of something. I could tell, even as a young boy, that it bothered her greatly. I think she took it as evidence of some deep failure as a homemaker. Mary Schafer always gladly leant my mom whatever she needed. Mary Schafer always had more than enough of everything.

Not wanting a lack of ingredients to ruin two lives on my watch, I left a piece of pita on the window sill as a gesture of good will. It was the least I could do for having my kitched feng-shued by this king of tree-dwellers.

I hoped beyond hope imagined it would invite more encounters.
Squirrel: I feel like an absolute shill asking old boy, but you wouldn’t happen to have a small jar of peanut butter I can gnaw through, feed on, and make a nest of, would you?
Me: Why squirrel, of course.
Squirrel: I haven’t put you out have I?
Me: Not at all, I have more than enough. You needn’t even ask.
Squirrel: I hadn’t intended to.
I felt good about this.

As of today, though, the pita of goodwill sits there, untouched. The nerve.

Sunday, September 05, 2004

Farce imitating [political] life

Being part the second of an informal (x)-part blog suggesting movies to watch if you are sick to death of the current race for President of the United States.
If The Candidate shows us the archetypal slide to center that is necessary to hold major public office in America, Being There gives us the archetypal centrist candidate himself.

Peter Sellers is perfect as Chance the Gardener, a true "blank slate candidate" and just what the country needs. He has no political opinions, no divisive viewpoints. He never argues. Just the opposite: he compulsively agrees with everyone. He also compulsively watches television, mimicking the movements of the actors.

He let's you call him by any name you want.

Chance has the IQ of a toddler, the wardrobe of a prohibition-era millionaire and the stunning good looks of a movie star.

He's a fantastic listener.

His speech is deliberate, direct and focused, but is so absurd and single-minded that, in any context, his words are easily interpreted to be the pontifications of a profoundly elliptical political and economic guru. He's Nostradamus meets George Stephanopolous.
Chance the Gardener (Chauncey Gardiner): As long as the roots are not severed, all is well and all will be well in the garden . . . In a garden, growth has its season. There is spring and summer, but there is also fall and winter. And then spring and summer again...
The President: (staring at Chance) ...Spring and summer... (confused) Yes, I see...Fall and winter. (smiles at Chance) Yes, indeed.
.
.
.
The President (at news conference): To quote Mr. Gardiner, a most intuitive man, 'As long as the roots of industry remain firmly planted in the national soil, the economic prospects are un-doubtedly sunny.'
Of particular import to this year's election, Chauncey's total lack of a past is instantly seen as an asset.
Dudley: But what do we know of the man? Nothing! We have no inkling of his past!
Nelson: Correct, and that is an asset. A man's past can cripple him, his background turns into a swamp and invites scrutiny.
Caldwell: ...Up to this time, he hasn't said anything that could be used against him.
Chauncey is liked wherever he goes, as he is a perfect and unassuming vessel for people's narcissism. His words are your words--your words become his. He is always and perfectly the person you need him to be. He is even able--in a scene that had me cackling and dry-heaving at the same time--to facilitate Eva's (Shirley MacLaine) self-gratification by just being with her in the room (channel-surfing late night TV).

The only people who see him for what he really is aren't nearly self-possessed enough to have the power to expose him. Even if they did, I wonder if anyone would care.

Chauncey Gardiner: He's exactly what this arrogant country--and your arrogant party--needs [wants].

An' it's for sure a White man's world in America . . . Had no brains at all, was stuffed with rice puddin' between the ears! Short-changed by the Lord and dumb as a jackass an' look at him now!

Moving out is hard to do

There’s something intensely personal about deep-cleaning an apartment. You remember things you'’d forgotten, you confront things you’'d rather not. Moving is an uphill struggle through a gauntlet of densely packed realizations, each more frightening than the last. Along the way, you meet an eclectic cast of characters.
  • I have an unhealthy obsession with technology.
  • I have an even more disturbing habit of keeping not only the retail boxes the tech comes in, but the brown cardboard mailers as well.
  • Packing peanuts have grouped themselves into little nation-states in the corners of my closet/office.
  • I buy books I’ll never read because they look cool and/or people are likely to comment on them. "“Aspects of the Feminine? I love Jung!"” Yes, me too.
  • I buy posters knowing I'’ll never put them up because putting them up means they'll eventually have to be taken down.
  • I’m not careful enough with my clipped toe nails.
  • They are currently locked in a war of attrition with the packing peanuts.
  • What I thought was a big rat was really a giant red squirrel.
Those are the more mundane ones I'’ve allowed myself to own up to.

My own skeletons--now out of their closets and strewn half in liquor boxes throughout the apartment--and the scavenging rodentia are bad enough. The habits and lifestyle of my girlfriend, though, are now also cast in full and glaring relief. This is the stuff of nightmares.

Having lived with varying numbers of women (my cousin, a friend, another friend, Shannon) over the last two years, and my mother for many years prior, I consider myself used to the staggering amounts of hair shed by women on a daily basis. You find it in the usual places, balled up in every single drain, winding through hair brush bristles, clinging to lamp shades. When you really start digging though, it becomes less and less possible to think of a logical reason why anything would end up where this hair inevitably does. Entire locks of the stuff. There. And there.

Further, I found Nair tracing arcs and pin wheels in utterly inexplicable locations.

By noon yesterday, I was convinced Shannon spent her alone time chanting and tearing her hair out at the roots. She would pile it in corners while mimicking Pollock with her sugar-based hair removal paste in some Dionysian ritual of atonement for the sins of vanity and consumerism. Twirling, always twirling. I’m still looking for the remains of the bonfire of Banana Republic totes she would have danced around.

It's only a matter of time really.

“"My player is the Yamaha, and now I think it is good. Knock the wood." -- –Ali Lotfi, Café owner and former coach of the Iranian Women'’s Basketball team, ecstatic after finally fixing his Gypsy Kings CD. Sadly, his joy was short-lived.